[ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files

robert_weir at us.ibm.com robert_weir at us.ibm.com
Mon Jun 27 19:29:24 CEST 2011 

A lot of warnings with OOo 3.3, but only one error:

upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml[2,88]:Error:element 
"manifest:manifest" is missing "version" attribute

And if I'm understanding things correctly, if that missing attribute error 
is fixed then Office 2010 gives an error, because it is expecting ODF 1.1 
which did not define that attribute.

LO fixed the validation error, but either never tested it with Office 2010 
or decided that the error was acceptable.

How would you explain this to a user? 

Perhaps:   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqAssSazWvY

-Rob

plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org wrote on 06/27/2011 01:14:31 PM:

> From: Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens at fedict.be>
> To: ODF Plugfest mailinglist <plugtest at opendocsociety.org>
> Date: 06/27/2011 01:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files
> Sent by: plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org
> 
> Rob,
> 
> Uhm, I don't think it's an LO issue, since LO produces valid 
> documents and apparently OOo 3.3 doesn't...
> 
> Running an OOo 3.3 test file through the ODF Validator yields:
> 
> upload:///A test docoo.odt:Info:ODF Version: 1.2
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Thumbnails/' is not a sub-document and should not be 
> listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package 
> 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/images/' is not a sub-document and should
> not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package 
> 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/accelerator/' is not a sub-document and 
> should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/progressbar/' is not a sub-document and 
> should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/toolbar/' is not a sub-document and 
> should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/menubar/' is not a sub-document and 
> should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/toolpanel/' is not a sub-document and 
> should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/popupmenu/' is not a sub-document and 
> should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/statusbar/' is not a sub-document and 
> should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/floater/' is not a sub-document and 
> should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The 
> directory 'Configurations2/images/Bitmaps/' is not a sub-document 
> and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF 
> package 'upload:///A test docoo.odt'!
> internal:schema/odf12/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-rev02-manifest-
> schema.rng:Info:parsed.
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml[2,88]:Error:element
> "manifest:manifest" is missing "version" attribute
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Info:1 errors, 11 
warnings
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/mimetype:Info:no errors, no warnings
> upload:///A test docoo.odt:Info:Media Type: application/
> vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
> 
internal:schema/odf12/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-rev02-schema.rng:Info:parsed.
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/meta.xml:Info:Generator: OpenOffice.org/
> 3.3$Win32 OpenOffice.org_project/330m20$Build-9567
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/meta.xml:Info:no errors, no warnings
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/settings.xml:Info:no errors, no warnings
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/styles.xml:Info:no errors, no warnings
> upload:///A test docoo.odt/content.xml:Info:no errors, no warnings
> internal:schema/odf12/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-rev02-dsig-
> schema.rng:Info:parsed.
> upload:///A test docoo.odt:Info:1 errors, 11 warnings
> 
> 
> 
> Bart
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org [plugtest-
> bounces at opendocsociety.org] On Behalf Of robert_weir at us.ibm.com 
> [robert_weir at us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 6:56 PM
> To: ODF Plugfest mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files
> 
> Is this a new bug?  Did LO 3.3 (or OpenOffice 3.3 or 3.4 beta) have the
> same issue?
> 
> -Rob
> 
> plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org wrote on 06/27/2011 11:39:13 AM:
> 
> >
> > Mm, indeed, removing that attribute does the trick.
> >
> > Note that this is about the manifest:version on the manifest:manifest
> element.
> > The manifest:file-entry element also has a manifest:version="1.2",
> > but that does not seem to break things.
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Bart
> > ________________________________________
> > From: plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org [plugtest-
> > bounces at opendocsociety.org] On Behalf Of Vollmar, Dirk
> > [Dirk.Vollmar at dialogika.de]
> > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 3:42 PM
> > To: ODF Plugfest mailinglist
> > Subject: Re: [ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > From my analysis it seems that the problem is the manifest:version
> > attribute which has been added in ODF 1.2 (see attachment).
> >
> > This attribute is created by LibreOffice in Bart's sample document,
> > hence the document is no longer a valid ODF 1.1 document. Using the
> > ODF validator at http://tools.services.openoffice.org/odfvalidator/
> > shows the following errors when validating against ODF 1.1:
> >
> > > upload:///test.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml[2,111]:Error:unexpected
> > attribute "manifest:version"
> > > upload:///test.odt/meta.xml[2,874]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "meta:non-whitespace-character-count"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,6045]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "style:name"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,6555]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,6917]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,7276]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,7638]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,8000]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,8362]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,8724]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,9083]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,9446]:Error:unexpected attribute
> > "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > > upload:///test.odt:Info:Generator: LibreOffice/3.4$Win32
> > LibreOffice_project/340m1$Build-12
> >
> >
> > As Office 2010 is only supporting ODF 1.1, one cannot expect Office
> > to open the document; certainly the error message could be more
> > descriptive though.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Dirk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org [mailto:plugtest-
> > bounces at opendocsociety.org] On Behalf Of Hanssens Bart
> > Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2011 15:11
> > To: ODF Plugfest mailinglist
> > Subject: Re: [ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files
> >
> > ndeed, I have the same issue, error when opening a LO 3.4 odt on
> > Win7 with MSO 2010 64 bit.
> >
> > OTOH, MS-Office 2010 opens odt generated by OOo 3.3 with warnings,
> > but there is some difference between the test manifest file
> > generated by OOo 3.3 and LO 3.4 (see attachments)
> >
> > Don't have LO 3.3 at hand, but perhaps someone could check to see if
> > there's much difference between LO 3.3 and LO 3.4 vs OO 3.3 and LO 3.3
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Bart
> > ________________________________________
> > From: plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org [plugtest-
> > bounces at opendocsociety.org] On Behalf Of Milos Sramek
> [sramek.milos at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 2:45 PM
> > To: ODF Plugfest mailinglist
> > Subject: Re: [ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files
> >
> > Dňa 24.06.2011 17:52, robert_weir at us.ibm.com  wrote / napísal(a):
> > > plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org wrote on 06/24/2011 11:29:10 AM:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I am new on this list - my name is Milos Sramek.
> > >>
> > >> I've just noticed that MSO2010 does not open ODF files produces by
> > > LO3.4.
> > >> MSO says: The file is corrupt and cannot be open (see the attached
> > >> picture). However, the file passed both validation tests, as
> > >> available at officeshots.org.
> > >>
> > >> MSO then offers to correct the file and subsequently opens it
> correctly.
> > >> When saved, the new file does not validate with one of the 
ODFToolkit
> > >> validator.
> > >>
> > >> This behavior can be easily reproduced, I checked that with several
> > > files.
> > > I don't have Office 2010 so I have not seen this.  Have you tried
> > > diff'ing the two ODF documents to see what Office changes?  That 
would
> > > be interesting to know.
> > I diffed them with the standard diff, but I did not see anything.
> > These files have just one long line and one does not see what is
> > really different.
> >
> > Milos
> > > -Rob
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Plugtest mailing list
> > > Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> > > http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > email & jabber: sramek.milos at gmail.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Plugtest mailing list
> > Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> > http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest
> > _______________________________________________
> > Plugtest mailing list
> > Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> > http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plugtest mailing list
> Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest
> _______________________________________________
> Plugtest mailing list
> Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest

More information about the Plugtest mailing list