[ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files

robert_weir at us.ibm.com robert_weir at us.ibm.com
Mon Jun 27 18:56:15 CEST 2011


Is this a new bug?  Did LO 3.3 (or OpenOffice 3.3 or 3.4 beta) have the 
same issue? 

-Rob

plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org wrote on 06/27/2011 11:39:13 AM:

> 
> Mm, indeed, removing that attribute does the trick.
> 
> Note that this is about the manifest:version on the manifest:manifest 
element.
> The manifest:file-entry element also has a manifest:version="1.2", 
> but that does not seem to break things.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Bart
> ________________________________________
> From: plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org [plugtest-
> bounces at opendocsociety.org] On Behalf Of Vollmar, Dirk 
> [Dirk.Vollmar at dialogika.de]
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 3:42 PM
> To: ODF Plugfest mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> From my analysis it seems that the problem is the manifest:version 
> attribute which has been added in ODF 1.2 (see attachment).
> 
> This attribute is created by LibreOffice in Bart's sample document, 
> hence the document is no longer a valid ODF 1.1 document. Using the 
> ODF validator at http://tools.services.openoffice.org/odfvalidator/ 
> shows the following errors when validating against ODF 1.1:
> 
> > upload:///test.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml[2,111]:Error:unexpected 
> attribute "manifest:version"
> > upload:///test.odt/meta.xml[2,874]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "meta:non-whitespace-character-count"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,6045]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "style:name"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,6555]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,6917]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,7276]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,7638]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,8000]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,8362]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,8724]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,9083]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt/styles.xml[2,9446]:Error:unexpected attribute 
> "text:list-level-position-and-space-mode"
> > upload:///test.odt:Info:Generator: LibreOffice/3.4$Win32 
> LibreOffice_project/340m1$Build-12
> 
> 
> As Office 2010 is only supporting ODF 1.1, one cannot expect Office 
> to open the document; certainly the error message could be more 
> descriptive though.
> 
> Best regards,
> Dirk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org [mailto:plugtest-
> bounces at opendocsociety.org] On Behalf Of Hanssens Bart
> Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2011 15:11
> To: ODF Plugfest mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files
> 
> ndeed, I have the same issue, error when opening a LO 3.4 odt on 
> Win7 with MSO 2010 64 bit.
> 
> OTOH, MS-Office 2010 opens odt generated by OOo 3.3 with warnings, 
> but there is some difference between the test manifest file 
> generated by OOo 3.3 and LO 3.4 (see attachments)
> 
> Don't have LO 3.3 at hand, but perhaps someone could check to see if
> there's much difference between LO 3.3 and LO 3.4 vs OO 3.3 and LO 3.3
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Bart
> ________________________________________
> From: plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org [plugtest-
> bounces at opendocsociety.org] On Behalf Of Milos Sramek 
[sramek.milos at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 2:45 PM
> To: ODF Plugfest mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [ODFPlugtest] MSO does not read LO files
> 
> Dňa 24.06.2011 17:52, robert_weir at us.ibm.com  wrote / napísal(a):
> > plugtest-bounces at opendocsociety.org wrote on 06/24/2011 11:29:10 AM:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am new on this list - my name is Milos Sramek.
> >>
> >> I've just noticed that MSO2010 does not open ODF files produces by
> > LO3.4.
> >> MSO says: The file is corrupt and cannot be open (see the attached
> >> picture). However, the file passed both validation tests, as
> >> available at officeshots.org.
> >>
> >> MSO then offers to correct the file and subsequently opens it 
correctly.
> >> When saved, the new file does not validate with one of the ODFToolkit
> >> validator.
> >>
> >> This behavior can be easily reproduced, I checked that with several
> > files.
> > I don't have Office 2010 so I have not seen this.  Have you tried
> > diff'ing the two ODF documents to see what Office changes?  That would
> > be interesting to know.
> I diffed them with the standard diff, but I did not see anything. 
> These files have just one long line and one does not see what is 
> really different.
> 
> Milos
> > -Rob
> > _______________________________________________
> > Plugtest mailing list
> > Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> > http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest
> >
> 
> 
> --
> email & jabber: sramek.milos at gmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plugtest mailing list
> Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest
> _______________________________________________
> Plugtest mailing list
> Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest




More information about the Plugtest mailing list