[ODFPlugtest] ODF 1.2 draft not compliant itself?

[Andreas Guelzow]

On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:11 +0200, J.M. Maurer wrote:

> You are of course technically correct. The problem however is that the
> spec did not change at all in this area (bookmarks), so why use a
> bookmark construct that conforms to neither the ODF 1.1 nor 1.2 draft
> specification?
> 
Implementations have bugs. I would be surprised if there were any
sufficiently complex ODF implementation that doesn't have bugs. I think
it is already great when an implementation doesn't create files that are
violate the schema.

Andreas