[ODFPlugtest] progress + new scenarios

Sven Langkamp sven.langkamp at gmail.com
Fri Jul 31 04:47:08 CEST 2009


On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens at fedict.be>wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> small update, the OOo started working on fixing an issue with presentation
> placeholders
> (and the KOffice team fixed an issue a few weeks ago)
>
>
> http://plugtest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=scenarios:20090623:presentation-placeholder


I'm wondering if the presentation:placeholder attribute has any usecase
after the fix proposed by the OOo team.
It looks to me like adding an undefined workaround for an underspecified
spec feature.

I'm planning to write a few more scenarios this weekend.
>
> As Doug (Microsoft) already reported in one of his blog posts, change
> tracking in ODF is a real issue,
> so probably it's a good idea to take a look at the new versions of
> different implementations
>  (IIRC, the KOffice team is busy implementing this feature)


Yes, we are implementing change tracking and we noticed too that the spec is
missing a lot that would be needed for good change tracking.


Another scenario (suggested by Andrew, Gnumeric) is a more detailed test for
> formulas
> (the infamous msoxl- and oooc:-style formulas)
>
> Perhaps another presentation scenario might be interesting as well...
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bart
> _______________________________________________
> Plugtest mailing list
> Plugtest at opendocsociety.org
> http://lists.opendocsociety.org/mailman/listinfo/plugtest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open.nlnet.nl/pipermail/plugtest/attachments/20090731/270404ab/attachment.html>


More information about the Plugtest mailing list